So FIFA can make a ruling against a Club on a player that left that Club to another even tho the Club received no transfer money???
and yet sits on the fence looking at a "big Club" in Spain not paying agreed transfer monies for players and yet they are allowed to play for the Spanish Club??? But FIFA can't/wont do nothing about that???
How the fork does that work???
Oh ya rules and sanctions don't apply to the "big Clubs" even-though this Club was one of the breakaway teams that wanted to set up a new European super league.
Typical corruption in football, its happening in every league in the world the rules are stacked in the favour of the big boys and "if" someone begins to challenge the elite then some bullsh*t ruling is made to kick the upstart back down from where they came from.
Since it was ruled that we had to pay redbull Leipzig for him and it has now been ruled that we should have been paying the player. Can we now demand fees from the french club he was at and also Basel where he is currently. Basically he has been working else where without our permission (given we are to pay him according to courts). Surely that breach of contract.
This is just pure b*llo*
So FIFA can make a ruling against a Club on a player that left that Club to another even tho the Club received no transfer money???
and yet sits on the fence looking at a "big Club" in Spain not paying agreed transfer monies for players and yet they are allowed to play for the Spanish Club??? But FIFA can't/wont do nothing about that???
How the fork does that work???
Oh ya rules and sanctions don't apply to the "big Clubs" even-though this Club was one of the breakaway teams that wanted to set up a new European super league.
Typical corruption in football, its happening in every league in the world the rules are stacked in the favour of the big boys and "if" someone begins to challenge the elite then some bullsh*t ruling is made to kick the upstart back down from where they came from.
Sickening